The claims, evidence, and legal briefs for all of our clients' relief claims have been submitted to the EEOC Administrative Judge. With this fast, favorable decision by EEOC-OFO, the course is now set to have the claims review process commence in the very near future. There is no need at this time to send a copy of the Pittman claim form to our offices. The next status conference with the EEOC Judge is scheduled for August 2019. However, before you turn down any relief, you should speak with Class Counsel to explore your options. March 4, 2022 - Status Update - Status Conference - NRP Class Action The bottom line remains as before: there is no indication at this time that the Agency is prepared to make any settlement offer to any claimants. It has come to our attention that a number of people who were Class Members in the Pittman v. USPS class action have been receiving letters from USPS about that settlement process. In advance of this conference, per the request of the Administrative Judge, our offices re-submitted all claimant related documents for her consideration. Additionally, Judge Roberts-Draper also scheduled a status conference with the Agency and Phase 1 Class Counsel for May 12, 2022 at 11:00 am. Please continue to check our website for updates. After that, the EEOC Administrative Judge assigned to this case will issue an order regarding the claims determination process. To help support your claim that you were harassed as part of the NRP, you should consider providing additional information in a Continuation sheet. Todays Order is somewhat complicated, and it is possible that the Judge will issue revisions as the process moves forward. Yes, but before you call us please review the cover letter and all instructions in the mailing and on this website. Previously, we urged all of our clients to complete and return Declaration forms to us no later than March 25, 2019. We remain extremely grateful to all who have hired us to represent their interests in this fight against the Postal Service. It is worth noting that on the video call was EEOC Administrative Judge McCauley and a data person from the EEOC. We appealed this improper action by the Postal Service. We keep track of our clients' contact information, and we can provide that to USPS or the EEOC Administrative Judge when they need it. Thank you. *
Class Counsel has asked the EEOC Administrative Judge to reconsider, or at least delay the effect of, the recently-issued Case Management Order until after the scheduled March 20, 2019 status conference. We will not submit claim packages for claimants who have not retained our firms to represent them in the claims process. Yes, if you retain us, you will owe a 30% contingency fee on the value of your recovery. For most claimants, filling out the form will take less than one hour. RULING REGARDING NRP ACTIVITY FILES It is undisputed that NRP Activity files were produced to Phase I Class Counsel during discovery. v. United States Postal Service an AJ decision certified the following class: All permanent rehabilitation employees and limited duty employees at the U.S. USPS actually tried this in 2013 in this case, and the untimely appeal was rejected. The two law firms that serve as Class Counsel will work together to represent you, and your 30% contingency fee will cover all contingency fee payments to the law firms. The final appeal decision in the case was issued on March 9, 2018, and is available at NRPclassaction.com. We are mailing Claim Declaration forms to all of the Class Members who have retained our firms to represent them in the claims process. Our team is standing by! Judge Roberts-Draper indicated that she would issue a written order providing her decisions on some pending procedural motions. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Trackmaster Thomas & Friends Train Tank Engine - Red Passenger Coach - Hit Toy at the best online prices at eBay! Many of you have asked about the next steps in the EEOC process. Let us help you to fight for your rights. If we do get a recovery for you, from the final award that you receive in this case, we would be entitled to 30% of the gross, pre-tax total. Nevertheless, todays Order reflects the Judges strong desire to move the process forward decisively. Just do the best that you can with any information that you know. There may be better options that would work in your benefit. A status conference with the EEOC Administrative Judge is scheduled for March 20, 2019. If you have retained our firms to represent you, and if you have received forms recently from USPS, please call us immediately at 585-272-0540 to discuss completing these forms. Even though we cannot predict with certainty every twist and turn on the road ahead, we remain convinced that a fair and reasonable outcome can be achieved, if we continue forward with persistence and resolve. To schedule an employment law attorney consultation, please call or complete the intake form below. We will provide an update as soon as further news is available. Posted in Federal Worker Compensation, General, Postal Workers. The USPS attorneys sought to use the USPS March 17, 2021 appeal as a way to stall the case further and challenge the Administrative Judges authority. At this time, the Administrative Judge has not yet made her selection of Special Masters. We currently have no information regarding the nature of the EEOCs website or the notice, so unfortunately cannot yet provide answers to questions you may have, but we will provide a detailed update as soon as we have additional information. As the attorneys who initially filed the charge that began this action back in 2007, we understand this has been a long and frustrating road, but please know that we will continue to fight for each of our claimants. * Damage awards in other lawsuits are only identified as an example of the types of settlements obtained and
We hope that this will assist the Administrative Judge in getting all the claims in this case reviewed and decided in an efficient manner. The Judge asked a few clarifying questions about the submissions. We recommend emailing such letters to us at [email protected] or faxing us at 585-272-0574. * ATTORNEY ADVERTISING *
Welcome to the USPS Class Action Claim Website. Our suggested claim form is easy to complete. If you are unsatisfied with the Postal Service's final decision on your claim, which would come after the EEOC judge makes a determination, we would represent you in an appeal of that decision to the EEOC in Washington. Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1, [1897] AC 22 is a landmark UK company law case. We thank you all for your continued patience with this process. We are cautiously optimistic that 2023 will be a year of significant forward movement on your claims. Our office has filed an emergency motion for reconsideration of the EEOC Judges decision in order to ensure that all claimants have sufficient time to complete the paperwork. They indicated that I would lose my job and my retirement benefits, so I felt I had no option except to retire; or The Judge answered this question explicitly, and the answer is No. The Judge noted that there are two ways this case will be resolved: (1) either through the special master process; OR (2) if a claimant opts out and seeks a FAD. Denver, CO 80202. We will provide an update after the status conference. The EEOC Administrative Judge may allow the parties to conduct discovery of documents and information, and take sworn depositions related to claims. On March 8, 2021, we followed the EEOC Administrative Judges orders, and filed a list of five potential Special Masters who can assist with processing the claims in this case. In a relatively short status conference this afternoon, the EEOC Administrative Judge let everyone know that the process is slowly moving forward one step at a time. Please continue to check this website for updates. For most people, the answer is no. Most people previously filled out a claim for individual relief form that included a written designation of our law firms to represent them. Again, if you have not yet provided us with a Disability Form (Supplemental Declaration Regarding Disability), you must provide that form to us right away so that it can be filed with the Judge by March 31. Earlier this week, the EEOC Judge spoke with our legal team about the possibility, in theory, for broad settlement of the claims for relief in this case. Please continue to monitor our website for more updates in the coming weeks. Separate Legal Personality (SLP) is the basic tenet on which company law is premised. In this case, the EEOC will appoint five Special Masters who will each have broad discretion to recommend damages and relief for the claims presented to them. NRP Class Action Lawsuit Update - December, 2020 The Postal Service is disrupting the process by issuing premature FADs. We hope the EEOC will act quickly to restore order to this process. We understand that there is some confusion as to the date when the spreadsheet submissions are due. Thomas & Friends Trackmaster JAMES MOTORIZED Train Tank Engine 2009 WORKS! You should include in a Continuation sheet a description of why you concluded or felt that you had to retire or separate at that time.If applicable to you, here are some possible short statements that can help explain what happened: We are hopeful that these additional resources will assist the Administrative Judge in the evaluation of the more than 28,000 claims that were filed. Our approach would lead to the fastest means of considering all Class Member claims in a fair manner. The Judge did not approve our request for NRP Activity Files to be provided regarding Claimants who did not hire our law firms, but said that she would wait to see the filings regarding those claims to determine whether she will order USPS to provide her with those NRP Activity Files at a later date. During the call, we voiced the frustration of our clients as to the continuous delay tactics used by the Agency that has made this process nearly fifteen years long and not yet complete. Postal Service, EEOC Case No. We all recognize this behavior by USPS: deny, deny, dispute, delay, until a Judge orders otherwise. Clients who would like to submit questions for us to address, please send your questions via email to [email protected] or send us a letter to Thomas & Solomon LLP, 693 East Avenue, Rochester, NY 14607. Our proposed Case Management Order is carefully tailored to this unprecedented case. We strongly encourage timely cooperation if you receive the notice from the EEOC. Our legal team has experience achieving successful class-wide settlements in complex cases, but we also have experience pushing forward with litigation if fair settlement cannot be reached with the other side. As a result of the Judges order, we soon should have all NRP Activity Files in connection with our firms clients. If you have any questions, please feel free to email us at [email protected] or call us at 585-272-0540. If you receive a Final Agency Decision related to the McConnell/NRP class complaint, please provide our office with a copy as soon as possible. With this fast, favorable decision by EEOC-OFO, the course is now set to have the claims review process commence in the very near future. Thank you for your continued patience through this process, and for your strong perseverance in the face of the Postal Services stalling tactics. Please continue to monitor this website for updates on the case. Nrpclassaction.com: Home | NRP Class Action Contact Employment Law Firms In Rochester NY | Contact Thomas & Solomon LLP Please note that the Judge did not order USPS to provide a copy of the NRP Activity File documents directly to any claimants in the case. 2. Ms. Further, we urged the Judge to direct USPS to promptly provide claimants with the partial relief that USPS has already conceded in these claims. 693 East Avenue
We are continuing the process of organizing this information as fast as possible. In order to access the recorded message, you will need to call a special phone number. A copy of Class Counsel's motion is available by clicking here. The Judge issued an order today, providing us with an extra 90 days to file submissions for our clients. If you have medical information related to the harm you experienced as a result of the NRP, you should submit that medical information now if possible. We greatly appreciate your patience during this process. The EEOC Administrative Judge explained that the purpose of the call was to explore the types of claim information that the Agency and our offices could provide to the EEOC in order to move the process forward. If you quit now, the Postal Service will get away with causing you harm, and justice will not be served. I was told that I would be sent to work for Walmart; or If you have not yet completed and returned the Declaration form to us, please do so as soon as possible. (Even in that small subset of claims, the Postal Service has not yet paid a single dollar to any claimant, to the best of our knowledge.) We need you to return the completed, signed Declaration form to us no later than March 25, 2019, in order for us to prepare and submit your complete claim package (including legal argument) to the EEOC Judge in a timely fashion. When we have additional details on the EEOC's hearing process for this case, we will post those details on this website. The Judge issued an important order today approving the use of Special Masters to assist the EEOC in reviewing the 28,000+ disputed claims in this case. 9. We believe that this action by the Postal Service is improper. Our goal is to move the claims forward as fast as possible with a fair and efficient process for all claimants. We will take all steps necessary to provide the Judge with timely submissions for all our clients. There is not a magic number for how much information should be submitted. You may email our office at [email protected] or call us at 585-272-0540. The EEOC does not require any particular format for medical information; medical reports, print-outs, and medical notes may all be provided. Please dont be discouraged: we are closer than ever to obtaining the relief you deserve from the Postal Service! When the judge provides information on how the claims process will be handled moving forward, we will post a new update on this website. As a general reminder: if you hired our law firms to represent you, we will respond to any and all requests by the EEOC or the Postal Service for information about your claim, and our offices will contact you if more information is needed. We eagerly await the next conference with the Court and will provide an update when one has been scheduled. Again, do the best you can with the information you know. Please know that the system with our recorded message can only handle a certain amount of callers at any given time, so please be patient if you do not get through the first time you call. The National Reassessment Process (NRP) is a USPS program that reviews all injured-on-duty employees serving in limited duty and/or rehabilitation positions. In the case of Sandra McConnell, et al. If you have trouble accessing the website referenced in the notice from the EEOC, you can call 877-465-4142 for assistance. Please continue to monitor the website for further updates. We continue to fight for justice for all of the claimants in this case. Pursuant to the Judges order, we will present the USPS attorneys with a list of all pages that were missing (or otherwise unreadable) from the USPS production of NRP Activity Files for Claimants who hired our law firms. She said that not all claims will receive a hearing, but that the EEOC would choose certain claims to be heard by EEOC Administrative Judges. Establishing the foundation of how a company exists and functions, it is perceived as, perhaps, the most profound and steady rule of corporate jurisprudence. The Administrative Judge thanked us for providing the information, and told us that the EEOC already addressed some of the concerns that we raised.
Class Counsel has proposed a process based on a successful approach used in numerous large-scale class actions. The EEOC has never been faced with a claimant class this large. During the video call, the Administrative Judge asked the Agency a series of questions as to their ability to quickly access a variety of information needed in order to evaluate claimants and to produce it in an excel format for the EEOC. The plaintiffs allege that the USPS failed to provide reasonable accommodations for these workers. Important: the phone number referenced in the notice from the EEOC should read 1-877-465-4142, and the correct website link is as follows: https://www.eeoc-nrpphase2.com/Home/portalid/0. Our class action lawsuit attorneys have a national reputation for successfully handling class action lawsuits of all types and sizes. The Judge emphasized the very large volume of documentation submitted to her, and also indicated that limited time and assistance was available to her. Yes, the Postal Service should have provided us the NRP file for each person. EEOC rules and guidelines require all parties to be willing to discuss the possibility of settlement with the EEOC Judge. The Administrative Judge held a video status conference today, and shared some news about the EEOC's plans for moving this case forward. See below for more information. First, please know that we will continue fighting to get you the best possible award. The next status conference is November 28, 2022. Our goal, like yours, is to continue fighting for a fair and reasonable outcome. That work includes representing you in your individual claim through the entire EEOC claims process. For example, if a manager told you that you had no other option than to retire, you should write out on a Continuation sheet a brief description of who said it to you and an approximate date, to the best you can. Because the enormous volume of individual claims is unprecedented at the EEOC, no one is completely certain about the precise path that the litigation will take. We greatly appreciate the Judges efforts. The judge may wish for a live hearing to determine the proper award for your claim. With a letter order on March 26, 2021, the EEOC Office of Federal Operations (EEOC-OFO) dismissed the USPS final action and appeal of the Administrative Judges orders regarding the use of Special Masters to assist with review of the claims. Before sending your completed forms to the Postal Service, please contact us, make a copy for your records, and then send our office a copy. The Judge partially granted our motion. U.S. Even if the Postal Service dramatically changes its tactics by accepting the entirety of your claim, there may still remain complicated issues, such as the proper value of any back pay or interest due to you. We will also address the risks of leaving the EEO process and starting your case all over again in federal court, something we strongly recommend against without talking to a member of the legal team first. In 2006, Sandra McConnell was reviewed under the NRP in the USPS Western New York District. The Administrative Judge held another video status conference with us today, and shared some news about the EEOC's plans for moving this case forward. US Postal Services Settles Discrimination Class Action for $17.3M 4. You may email our office at [email protected] or call us at 585-272-0540. NRP Class Action Update December 2020 - Postal Employee Network While small logistical concerns routinely come up as part of large-scale administration processes, the Administrative Judge assured us that the EEOC is taking care to provide effective oversight and ensure a proper process. This date (July 12, 2018) is well before the 30-day deadline for filing an appeal from the earliest FAD that we know about. Phase 1 Class Counsel asked about whether special masters will be utilized going forward, and requested additional information about the process that will be utilized in order to evaluate the claims. 6. If you intend to listen to the entire recording, please plan for a recording that lasts 30-45 minutes. And as always, please continue to monitor this website for any important updates. Third, the Judge stated that the EEOC plans to begin hearings on some claims sometime in the middle of 2023. Please know that we are fighting for you, just as we have done for over 10 years. As noted in our February 2021 update, the Judge recently issued an Order setting out a process for reviewing claims in this case. Due to these changes, please be aware that there may be delays in our offices responding to any inquiries. The Judge has indicated generally that a reasonable extension of time will be allowed, but the Judge has not yet issued a written order. We will continue to provide updates on this website as notable developments occur. If the EEOC orders the Postal Service to pay attorney fees related to your claim, those fees would come directly to us and not relate in any way to the 30% contingency fee payment.Of course, as the case proceeds, we are unable to predict what the final outcome will be. She emphasized, as she has previously, that the process may take some time, due to the very large number of claims. We will work to ensure that the EEOC again swiftly rejects the improper appeal, and work to have the EEOC Administrative Judge press forward with an efficient review process without delay. Attorney website: www.nrpclassaction.com Attorney phone #s: 585 272 0540 or toll free 877 272 4066 The 30 day window to file a written claim (measured from the date a class member receives notice from the Postal Service) provides a short time period. The Administrative Judge has not yet announced the process or timeline for reviewing claims. The Postal Service HAS NOT sent copies of these letters to your attorneys. This decision by EEOC-OFO means that the case remains fully before the EEOC Administrative Judge, and that she can use her discretion to find an appropriate method to have the claims reviewed and decided. Thank you for your support, assistance, and patience throughout this claims process. We emphasized that our clients have one simple goal: a just resolution for their claims of discrimination under the NRP. EEOC guidance sets forth an orderly process for the Administrative Judge to review and adjudicate disputed individual claims after class-wide discrimination has been found. Free shipping for many products! We will include appropriate documents from your NRP file when we submit your Declaration and our legal argument to the EEOC Judge. Thank you. At the present time, though, because there is no settlement, we are prepared to represent you on an individual basis to make your claim for recovery with a fee agreement on that basis. Click here to see the latest news on the case. The name of the case is McConnell v. U.S. For our clients, please provide your updated contact information to us. Of note, we may request feedback or clarification from some Claimants in the next few weeks. She set a deadline of March 31, 2020 to submit any and all supplemental documentation regarding claims. No. An update will be provided following the May 12, 2022 status conference. If you have already done so, thank you! While neither spoke during the video call, EEOC Administrative Judge Roberts-Draper did take several breaks in order to confer with her team and review her notes. Our goal is to get this matter resolved in a fair way as quickly as possible. If you have any questions about the forms when you receive them, please contact us at 585-272-0540. Other members of the class must proactively file claims to prove they are members of the class and will then also be entitled to relief. There has been no confirmation yet from the EEOC judge on whether Special Masters will be used to review a number of the claims. We will post an update on this website shortly after the Status Conference. For more information about the Pittman class action, please go to http://www.pittmanclass.com. Top Class Action Lawsuit Attorneys Rochester NY | Thomas & Solomon The Declaration form contains information that the EEOC Judge has requested for each claimant. Federal courts commonly use Special Masters to assist with adjudication of complex class actions. They would not give me an assignment that fit with my medical restrictions, so I had no option but to retire; or Our offices filed a motion for sanctions regarding the repeated failure of the Postal Service to comply with the Administrative Judges Order to produce a single spreadsheet with all claimant information and instead hiding behind an argument already rejected by the Judge. The EEOC Office of Federal Operations (EEOC-OFO) dismissed another USPS final action and appeal of the Administrative Judges orders regarding the use of Special Masters to assist with review of the claims. We will be in touch in the coming weeks if we need anything additional from you. We wanted to reach out and give a quick update on the case, and answer some questions that have been raised.